STAMINA has confirmed largely efficient to date, with simply over 99 p.c accuracy in classifying malware and a false optimistic fee just below 2.6 p.c. Nonetheless, it has its limits. It really works nicely with small recordsdata, however it struggles with bigger ones.
With sufficient refinement, although, this might be very helpful. Most malware detection depends on extracting binary signatures or fingerprints, however the sheer variety of signatures makes that impractical. This might assist anti-malware instruments successfully sustain and cut back the possibilities of safety threats slipping previous defenses.